Saturday, August 30, 2025
HomeZodiac GuideLucy Letby | Astrologers' Community & Forum

Lucy Letby | Astrologers’ Community & Forum


That’s a very good post you put up katydid.

When this story first appeared in the press, I thought how terrible and tragic but when people started to question the official narrative, it started to make me wonder why.

Now, I’m no medical expert but investigators and amateur sleuths, aswell as other medical professional give differing reasons.

-Lucy Letby was questioning natal care at that hospital

True, and MANY nurses and doctors were also questioning some of the NHS issues at the hospital. But none of those issues were found responsible for the deaths.

The issues had to do with being understaffed at times, being underfunded, etc. But in ALL of the cases she was charged with, all of the babies had 24/7 nursing care, as there were handwritten medical logs for each child, by nurse and doctors, and data from medical treatments and prescriptions given, etc. And doctors observations. For each baby there were handwritten notes showing the vitals taken and observations made about every 30 minutes.

So understaffing was not a cause of these incidents. Nor was underfunding a cause. These preemies were not having major surgeries or expensive treatments. They were just resting and trying to gain some weight and grow.

There were extensive tests done to check for infections or toxins in the system and none were found to be the cause of the deaths or collapses.

EVEN LUCY TESTIFIED HERSELF, AND AGREED THAT SUBPAR CARE WAS NOT THE CAUSE OF THESE INCIDENTS.

-Lucy Letby was having affairs with senior doctors

Lucy had one potential affair with one senior doctor, although she claimed they were just friends. But there were no other affairs. In fact, she might not have had any intimate relationships ever.

-She was the scapegoat for neglectful nurses

NO, absolutely not. The other nurses were originally very sympathetic and felt sorry that she was having such bad luck in the nursery. After the first THREE babies died within 2 weeks, and she was the one who found them unresponsive each time, her co-workrs nicely and kindly suggestd she work with the larger, healthier babies for a bit, so she could relax and recover.

She was angry that her co-workers suggested that. ALL OF THE TEXTS AND MESSAGES BETWEEN LUCY AND HER COWORKERS WERE SHOWN AT TRIAL. She was not being scapegoated.

-Other professionals argue the way she did the crimes could not happen

Those other professionals did not have access to all of the medical files and evidence. They even admit that themselves. They are looking at a small portion of the medical info when making that claim.

-Plus many more reasons

Now as I say, I’m no medical professional, but when others in their own field of work start questioning these crimes, the official narrative can start to collpase, then you get the ‘official’ story then the truth. That’s how I see it and I’m still unsure about the accuracy of her crimes.

There is so much more that I left out initially.

:sun::conjunct::neptune::conjunct::saturn: :opposition::chiron:
Lucy has a tight conjunction of Sun conjunct Neptune.
Her Sun is sandwiched between Saturn and Neptune in Cap. And it opposes Chiron, Jupiter and Squares the Moon.

But if we just focus upon the Sun/Neptune tight conjunction, exactly opposite Chiron it gives us some room to question her veracity and her reliability/truthfulness, imo.

Lucy falsified some of her medical logs, and was caught out at the trial for doing so. When they showed her notes compared to the others notes about each baby, it became evident that she wrote incorrect info, in order to try and distance herself from some of the babies, right before they collapsed. Some of her notes are in conflict with other staff and co-workers notes, who corroborate each others.

And other examples, like 2 other nurses would have 48 hours of medical data and vitals for a baby, showing strong heart rate, good oxygen levels, eating well, sleeping well, etc. Then Lucy comes on duty and the baby suddenly has drastic vitals, everything goes downhill quickly, unexpectedly. And collapses. That happened REPEATEDLY. >>>> 27 collapses.

Baby E was the most shocking example. The mother of Baby E tells her story which is in sharp contrast to the story Lucy told. The jury believed the mother because she had proof of her version.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-63214073

Lucy Letby trial: Mum walked in on nurse killing baby, trial told​

An alleged killer nurse was interrupted by the mother of one of her victims who paid her baby boy a visit at the neonatal unit, a court has heard.
Lucy Letby is accused of murdering five baby boys and two girls, and attempting to murder 10 other babies at Countess of Chester Hospital in 2015 and 2016.
Manchester Crown Court heard Child E’s mother did not realise he was being attacked and was told by the nurse the blood from his mouth was due to a tube.
Ms Letby, 32, denies 22 charges.
The nurse, of Hereford, is accused of murdering Child E and attempting to murder his twin, Child F, the following day.

The court heard how the twins had been born prematurely and Ms Letby was the designated nurse for both boys.

One night, their mother, who was an inpatient on the postnatal ward, decided to visit her sons in the neonatal unit.
The jury was told the mother interrupted Ms Letby, who was in the process of attacking Child E, but she did not realise this. Child E’s mother found her son acutely distressed and bleeding from his mouth.

Ms Letby attempted to reassure the mother saying: “Trust me I’m a nurse.”

The court heard the nurse urged the mother of Child E to go back to her ward, which she did, but was so concerned she phoned her husband.

Ms Letby later made a record on the nursing notes which was not true and “designed to cover her tracks”, prosecutor Nick Johnson KC said.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments